#DXO PURERAW FUJI ISO#

#DXO PURERAW FUJI ISO#

*There is a difference in the level of details between 26 MegaPickleRicks (I NEED TO TRADEMARK THIS TERM FOR T-SHIRT) and 42, by which I mean I am not seeing as many details even at ISO 160 as I would have liked. *ISO 12.800 is not particularly useful if there's fine texture/details because they are just scrambled (like grass, text, bricks, leaves, etc) *ISO 6.400 is VERY ROUGH, I mean pushing the shadows just adds no details or useful information to the image (it's just better to leave the shadows dark) *While Luminance noise looks quite pleasant I don't think/see it any better than Micro Four Thirds and not as good as Sony a7R II *The files are quite responsive on my laptop (Intel i7 9770H, 16GB DDR4, RTX 2060 75W TDP with no MUX integrated) *The Shadow recovery is very good, at lower ISO I managed to push it 3 stops with no issues, at higher ISO it's a bit more complicated (explained in The bad) *The Highlight recovery is quite good, at least 1 stop, possibly 2 stops if slightly underexpose, the blue colour in the sky is maintained in most pictures I tried *The Luminance noise is very pleasant on smooth backgrounds like the sky, it haves a very 'film' look to them, which I quite like that just blows my socks off because I am so 'tired' of seeing it on Micro Four Thirds but even 35mm FF (I get colour noise on my a7R II at ISO 100 if I push shadows) *The White Balance seems to be quite pleasant as well, not too warm or too cold (though I do tend to prefer on the warmer side) *I love the colours, they are very pleasant and warm The editor I used is Adobe Lightroom Classic CC version 11.2 I mainly focused on high contrast, high ISO or low light images to see how far the files can be pushed.

Just finished looking through RAW sample files I've downloaded off reviewer websites from X-T3, X-T4 and X-S10 (since it's the same sensor with the same processor).

Dxo pureraw fuji